Policy and Conditions

The review process is "double blind" - identification of both authors and referees is removed from all documentation. The Conference IPC believes that the review of papers gives conference participants and other readers some confidence in the quality of the papers specified as "refereed" in the proceedings.

Important: All papers must pass a plagiarism check using "Turnitin", and plagiarism rate must not exceed 20%. If more than 20%, the paper will be directly rejected.

Paper Evaluation Checklist

Editor Responsibilities

Accountability: Editors are responsible for deciding which articles should be published and must follow legal and ethical guidelines.

Fair Play: Manuscripts are evaluated for their intellectual content regardless of author background.

Confidentiality: Editors and staff must not disclose manuscript information beyond the necessary parties.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Information gained through peer review must remain confidential and not be used for personal gain.

Author Responsibilities

Reporting Standards: Authors must report results clearly and honestly, describing methods so others can reproduce the findings.

Originality and Plagiarism: Submitted work must be original, properly cited, and not previously published.

Data Access and Retention: Authors should retain raw data and make it available upon request.

Ethics: Research must follow ethical standards and legal requirements.

Conflicts of Interest: All financial and personal conflicts must be disclosed in the manuscript.

Authorship: Only those who made significant contributions should be listed as authors.

Multiple or Redundant Publication: Manuscripts must not be submitted to multiple outlets at once.

Errors in Published Work: Authors must inform the editor if they discover errors in their published work.